The debate of whether in the EU referendum on 23 June 2016
we should vote remain in the EU or to leave is beginning to heat up. This blog
post is one of two posts on the matter, this one focuses solely on why Britain
should remain in the EU. To see the post on Why Britain should leave the EU
please click here, please note these posts are designed be read in either order,
if you have already read this post you can skip this introduction. The reason
why I have decided to do two posts is primarily not to have to negate
statements to put forward the view of the other side which may show bias
towards one side or the other which is common in many comparison pieces I have
read. I do of course have my own view on this, however, it is not for me to
impose my views on anyone as they are my views alone so they will not be
disclosed at any point in writing. The format of both posts will be a mirror,
focusing on the topics of fees vs rebates, trade, investment, immigration,
security, jobs, health care, sovereignty, and Britain in the wider world.
By creating two posts there will be a great deal of overlap
as the same factual information will apply, however, this will demonstrate that
depending on what side of the debate you sit your view is shaped. I am taking
this approach as it is as if two people drew an elephant and one did from the
front and the other from behind, the two drawings would be completely different
but they could both say it was the same elephant!
These posts are not designed to give an overview of how the
EU works, this itself would be a massive post and there are far more
comprehensive and researched pieces available than I could produce due to
blogging being my hobby. If you would like more information on the EU I would
recommend to search on the internet for this, Wikipedia, is a good factual
starting point although should always be approached with caution but will give
context to what these blog posts are discussing.
Fees vs rebates
Britain’s membership of the EU for 2015 was £16bn for which
we received £4.5bn worth of spending directly from the EU. This figure does
sound like a lot of money, however, compared to the £250bn spent on health in
2013/14. This means that EU membership costs 6.4% of what the health did and
the difference is 4.6%, in terms of what a politician would say, for every £1
spent on health we spend just over 6p on EU membership and get nearly 2p back. From
the Britain Strong in Europe campaign, they do say that for each £1 that is put
into the EU we get £10 from things such as trade and investment, this figure is
of course needed to be taken with a pinch of salt from one of the campaigns,
however, it does show that for the money we put in products and services are
gained which of course all have a monetary value.
Trade
Approximately 50% of all our trade is done with the EU, this
is only 27 other countries all but one of whom have a smaller population than
our own. If you think about all the other countries around the world which have
a far larger population than the UK, such as the USA, China and Russia we are
focusing on a small portion of the world. These are our closest neighbours
which makes the logistics of transportation of goods far more economical and
environmentally friendly. For something such as free trade across Europe, which
I'm sure for anyone who has bought anything from the USA and had the joys of a
£8 handling charge before the import tax was applied that in itself is quite
handy when if the same thing was bought from inside the EU that wouldn't be
applied, which is applied across all imported goods from outside the EU.
Investment
An additional benefit of trade is investment, international companies
such as banks and car firms have set up hubs of industry in the UK to trade
both with ourselves and with the rest of the world. For all companies the
biggest thing is: how do I make as much money with as little red tape as
possible, which is a logical standpoint as if they feel restricted on the money
they can make to invest in their company to grow they will just seek out
another country that does not impose such restrictions. If by leaving the EU
trade was restricted, companies would highly consider moving into the EU as it
would be more cost effective for themselves. International companies are not
tied to the UK so wouldn't see the impact of job losses in the same way as they
would be creating alternative jobs elsewhere.
Immigration
Immigration the news depicts this as an open door for anyone
who wishes to come to the UK from inside the EU can do so without any
difficulties, there are 2.93 million non-EU immigrants in the UK compared to
1.73 EU immigrants which does show that immigration is a worldwide phenomenon and
leaving the EU would not necessarily stop EU citizens moving to the UK. This is
not a bad thing, for the NHS for example there was a recruitment drive within
the EU for staff as we have a shortage of qualified British doctors and nurses,
whom without the NHS would not be able to function. There is also the reverse,
there are 1.4 million British people who live abroad in the EU, they would have
to potentially move back to the UK in order to complete visas as is required in
the US and Australia in order to return to their home and a career that they
have spent many years establishing, many of whom may not even see the UK as
home any more.
Security
Following the increase of terrorist attacks around the world
national security is one of the biggest concerns to people after job security
and their own personal welfare, nobody wishes to have to live in fear of
whether the method of transport or their location is putting them in danger
from potential threats. As a member of the EU we work together with other
European countries to share intelligence to foil terrorist plots and have
access to the European Arrest Warrant. If that intelligence was taken away from
us we would need to fund the shortfall in monitoring at a great cost to
ourselves and we would be left more vulnerable. The idea of closing the borders
also seems a moot point as we cannot possibly screen everyone with closed
borders and know their true intent of coming into the country, and also with
less intelligence on people we would be at an even greater disadvantage.
Jobs
It is said that around 1 in 10 jobs are linked to the EU in
some way, be it someone who pops over to France at a weekend for cheap booze
and sells it in England at a high price for the privilege of it coming from the
supplier or industry where they build components for any number of machines
across the continent. If those links are broken and the cost to supply the
goods is no longer cost effective the jobs will slowly dwindle and vanish. In a
country that is still suffering the consequences of the 2008 economic crash,
any jobs regardless of how they are created (so long as they are legal of
course) do need to be considered. It also works in reverse, if you had a dream
to live in an EU country and your experience was highly sought after you can do
that legally without a need for a visa and all manner of paperwork.
Health care
The NHS is one of the biggest triumphs of modern Britain,
this is not only limited to the UK, in Europe if we have the EHIC card we are
entitled to either free or reduced health care within the EU and Switzerland.
If you are sick abroad in one of 31 other European countries there is no worry
whether you can afford the care that you need if it is necessary. This is
something that is always a weight off any travellers mind if for whatever
reason the EHIC card is needed.
Sovereignty
Whenever the EU is discussed British sovereignty is always
questioned, ‘how can we be British if our laws are governed by Brussels?’ The
idea that our laws are created by people who don’t know our way of life as the
British seems to be abhorrent to all Brits. The thing we need to ask ourselves
is do our actual politicians that we elect actually understand us, for example
is your MP a person who was born and raised in your constituency? Many EU laws
are written with the greater good of Europe and the world, such as those on
climate change and fishing quotas. We have been required to cut carbon emissions
because of EU laws to protect the environment, with the added pressure from the
EU countries have actually acted to do this and the continent will prosper
because of it. One of the most controversial laws is that of fishing quotas,
many jobs in the fishing industry were lost because the restrictions meant that
people could not catch enough fish to have it as their livelihood. However,
fishing quotas were bought in to curb over fishing that damages the ecosystem
in the sea, as a planet we rely on the sea for many things and it should be
respected.
Britain in the wider world
Britain’s place in the wider world has changed dramatically
over the last two centuries, we were a part of the largest empire on the planet
until the end of World War II, Britain did indeed rule the waves. However, the
idea of empire fell out of favour due to all the bloody uprisings that took
place to kick Britain and other European nations out. Today if I for example
jumped on a plane and travelled to some far flung corner of the globe, British
flag in hand and declared the territory now under British rule, I would
probably be locked up for insanity. However, as recently as last century that
was seen as a heroic honour (how times change). If we left the EU we wouldn't
be able to claim back our old colonies and make Britain ruler of all, we would
just be Britain again needing to find our place again without the EU as our
greater status.
Conclusions
Britain is not a minor EU country, we have some of the
biggest clout in Brussels, yes other countries may not like it when we say no
to things but they do actually listen to what we say and that is a power we do
have in the EU. For the funds we put into the EU we do get a great deal of
benefits, some additional ones include discounted roaming charges when we go
abroad than countries outside the EU. Of course the EU is not perfect it is a
union of 28 very different sovereign states all of whom have their own
priorities, needs and a fair deal from the membership of the EU but together
the EU is a united body which helps us with trade, security and gives us
financial benefits. By shutting the EU out we are also locking ourselves into the
UK and would make it far more difficult to travel on holiday. Surely this
should show you that we should remain in the EU.
If you have not already read the second of this blog series
on why Britain should leave the EU, please click here. I hope these two blog
post help you decide on one of the biggest decisions that Britain will have to
make on Europe since it decided to join the EEC in 1973, and voted in the 1975
referendum to stay in the EEC by 67.2% to 32.8% opposed. When you make up your
mind please try to avoid propaganda leaflets published by the political groups
which represent the in and out campaigns as they are trying to persuade you to
agree with them and in the limited space they have will gloss over anything
that may put their argument into doubt.
Comments
Post a Comment